Andrea Dworkin has been an influential write, speaker, and activist for over two decades. She claims to be a feminist, and that her ideas are beneficial to women. This paper will show that some of her most popular beliefs are non only damaging to society, notwithstanding also not in the best interests of women.
        In letters from a war zone, Andrea Dworkin presents a collection of speeches and perfectly articles she has composed during her career as a writer and activist. galore(postnominal) of her articles deal with censorship and smut. One claim is central to all told of these, smut is an act and not an idea, thus censorship is not relevant to it.
        In response to a New York epoch Review of her 1981 book, Pornography: Men Possessing Women, Dworkin writes, Pornography says the women call for to be hurt, forced, and abused; pornography says women want to be raped, battered, kidnapped, maimed; pornography says women want to be humiliated, shamed, defamed, pornography says that women say no but mean yes - Yes to violence, yes to pain.(Dworkin p 203)
        In response to Dworkins fiery rhetoric, Wendy Mcelroy writes that Dworkin has scientific backing and even cites evidence to the contrary.
In Japan, where pornography show violence is widely available, rape is much lower per capita than in the United States, where violence in porn is restricted. Mcelroy attacks the belief that pornography cause violence, stating that even if a correlation is present, is does not needs mean there is a causal relationship. (McElroy 102)
        Lynne Segal sees in constitutional harm in causeing to link the two together. She believes that feminists who try to do so are wasting valuable cartridge clip that could be spent on other important issues. In the end, anti-pornography campaigns, feminist or not, can only enlist today,
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment