Battered women make up what is one of the most marginalized groups in society. Their affinity experiences sometimes bring these women into conflict with the law, especially when they kill their disgraceful partners. Battered woman syndrome was developed in the 1970s by a clinical psychologist and was created to describe the cycle of events that abused women often go through in their relationships. In Canadian law it is accept in the context of other defenses, bringing buffet women syndrome into the lawcourt involves the use of well-prepared proof. It has become obvious in the past that women apply been enured in a stereotypical way by the Canadian courts. Their circumstances and needs were not goody interpreted into account. Before changes in the law in 1990, there was a g interceptered construction of the self-defense doctrine that evaluated females against a male timeworn of reasonableness. This problem was intended to be put to the end with the authoritative Court decision in R.v. Lavallee. With all these changes, especially Lavallee, the evaluator remains was working to become more considerate to the special(prenominal) experiences of women who had been victimized. However, the question is, how are battered women in particular treated by the criminal system today?
While the logical implication of Lavalle cannot be taken too lightly as it brought an classic point to the attention of the courts, it has not been shown that the decision has put an end to biases that are problems for battered women in the justice system. Specifically, this paper impart address the following: Has the Canadian criminal justice system become more sensitive to the troubles of battered women, or has the prosecutorial border become more harsh in its acceptance of the battered woman syndrome as a criminal defense. Through the mental test of the law and the success of...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment