Testimony

ADJ 265 Find a modern or past flirting trial (via Internet or television) where an investigator or officeris called to testify. value the officers role and if he/she follows the guidelines on pp. 129-34 of the text. Then evaluate get across to one-half of the officers court testimony. In700-1,050 words, line and summarize the trial you discover and evaluatedTestimonyNathan Janes was testifying in the court lesson where Ashley Howes was being tried for track into of a child she was watching. Nathan Janes was fitly garbed in explosive charge attire when he was on the stand. He spoke rush up windably and with an appropriate situration which those in the court could reveal him and understand what he was verbalizeing. He used many types of fillers when he was speaking, he repeatedly would say um. This made him look as if he was uncertain as how to perform the forefronts. He did non devolve on in an upright position. He would scat forward and was fidgety. He sat with his legs uncrossed which did show that he was open. It did not kris that he knew what he was going to say. It did not seam handle he had reviewed his notes prior to his testimony. ?This creates a inquiry in the sense of the judge, jury, or defense attorney as to how accurately an officer recalls the events of that circumstance investigation.

? (Grubb & Hemby, 2003, p. 130) He did take care to the questions and not answer withal quickly. When he did not hold out the answer to the question if the daughter understood her rights he state he did not have it away if she knew. This did not make him take care less worthy by not knowing. The other investigator that was interviewed was investigator Chilo. researcher Chilo was dressed appropriately. The judge said that Detective Chilo... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper