Social Media Academic Essay

English 1020 October 31 2011 Menial Media Employees Waste Hours of Time on the net income Many batch agree that brotherly net shiting in the employment is un slight asking for disaster and blemish of productivity. Having different types of brotherly net feeds in the piece of lop could also lead to uncomfortable situations between coactors that could be bad for blood line. However, more disagree and believe that these grades hobo bring coworkers closer together. Not solely do they believe it would bring coworkers together, they also say that this could increase business due to the family-like style that the given slayice has.Although this may be genuine in some cases, studies show that the studyity of the m, societal networking is genius of the downfalls of a association be instance of web locates such(prenominal) as Wiki Links, Facebook and Twitter that cause disturbances in the workplace and may even cause some of the companys private training to be leaked. Because social networking sites ar such a distraction and cause prison term to be taken away from productivity, they should be banned from the workplace for employees. transport social networking into the workplace is some prison terms risky for one who is carrying to get a job.Employers hind end explore future prospects and see what their online life is like. Although a soul may non be able to be completely mute solely by their social networking site, an employer might judge them based off of it. For example, had someone had a picture of themselves tagged online for the public to see, an employer might prevail that bad publicity for the company and decide not to hire this person. However, those who apply for jobs have options to set their describes on private and social networking companies ar not held responsible for the material posted. When joining either MySpace or Facebook or Twitter, the user mustiness agree to the terms of service and to the meshwork sites p rivacy policies (Elzweig and Peeples Using amicable). If anything negative move ons in the line of a person not organism hired for a job due to a social networking site, that site will not be held accountable. In a fewer cases this does work unwrap to the benefit of the applicant. A CargonerBuilder survey of more than 2,500 employers, released in noble of this year, indicated 35 percent of respondents use social media to promote their companies(Hunt Finders Keepers).This pith that in that respect are endless opportunities for people to find jobs on advertisements of social networking sites. However, a company can also use these sites to see past jobs and responsibilities and declare up on their background. Again, this is good for some people, but for others it is a incubus having to go through their networking site and clear up their breeding. It is absurd for businesses to intercede in affairs that do not concern them. As capacious as an employee is doing his job ripe, then employers should mind their own.Employers who use social networking sites to hold back up or review their employees are not being addressate to the ain lives of their workers. If, perhaps, an applier has made it past the stage of being handpicked and selected through the unfair means of social networking, he should not be allowed to access his personal networking site during work hours. This is a major distraction that could cause hours of work and productivity to be put off so that employees can update statuses, tweet, and interrupt personal emails. Most business workers admit to spending at least(prenominal) one hour of their work time on a social networking site.Should companies be responsible for paying employees for this hour of free time? except 10% of business allow their workers to be on social networking sites whenever they recreate (Schiller Employers Crack). Some argue that these sites are simply mind refreshers for employees. However, many others make an ev en more valid point that if a worker really needed a mind refresher, then he should go on a ten minute walk outside less productivity lost, and such(prenominal) more healthy. complaisant networking sites cause too much distraction in the workplace and should not be allowed.If the distraction of checking the website a few times a daylight is not enough, then consider the possibility of cyberfights. Employees upsetting each other over these sites is begging for disaster. disgruntled employees lead to an unhappy workplace, so why allow the possibility of that to happen? Yes, it could be said that these social networks could lead to a family-like environment, however the possibility for the latter is much more probable. Coworkers disagreeing with each others personal lives is a major disaster to the stability of the workplace and could potentially lead to an employee being dismissed or susp terminate.Embarrassing, childish, and shameful arguments happen over the internet e real da y. unitary lawyer speaks,I dont need the world knowing every time I make a comment . . . theres a lot that you can do to tweak your settings (Schaffer Online Networking). What would stop these arguments from happening between coworkers in a workplace? Even friending coworkers is a potential problem, in particular if the operator of the account does not like work or does not like the people at work and forgets the incident that they have been friends.This occupational hazard could well be avoided by not allowing social networking sites in the workplace. sociable networks are meant for ones personal life work is not ones personal life, so one shouldnt mix the two. It is a bit of a gray area for or so people because they do not know whether they should add coworkers onto their sites or not. Workers should work during work time and play during play time. The two should never be mixed. It is simply unprofessional to have a Facebook page up small-arm at a work desk.There is a right time for everything, and the right time for social networking and communicating is for spare time , not working. neighborly Networking sites waste time and resources for the company. If one employee spends one hour of company time on Facebook everyday, it potentially costs his or her employer more than $6,200 per year (Facebook be). This time spent playing on social networking sites is losing businesses money, companies are better off retributory letting employees go home an hour primal without pay duration banning social networking sites, than allowing workers to waste this money.Another hazard of allowing personal lives to clash with work lives, is the material that is posted. It is almost too much zippo to make sure that the boss cannot see when, Called in sick to work- fishing Day is posted as a status. This could end a flow career. Once, I worked in a clothing store where a missy called in sick, only to post on twitter a few hours later that she and her friends were having a sleepover. This seems pretty harmless, and although I did not care, my boss was very upset.She left a memo on the board the next day saying that if people were not going to be smart close what they posted on their social networking sites, then they would be fired. It is also kind of a hassle to make sure that no unflattering pictures that shouldnt be seen by a boss, are not seen. If an applicant or employee demonstrates a lack of discretion and judgment by posting spring muffle photos showing himself or herself apparently intoxicated on a social networking page, an employer who finds these photos online may consider the photos when deciding . . . to retain the employee (Baker How Far).Some say that people who are this careless should be fired anyway, but most people are completely forgetful of who they have accepted as their Facebook friend and sometimes just dont think before they post. This scenario could be completely avoided if work and social media were not mixed. The Basic Information section on social networking sites is a element that could ruin many relationships at work. At work, coworkers probably do not know the entire background detail of many of their colleagues. Easy research could lead to uncalled for prejudices against others.Social networking sites are taken out of context when they are brought to the work place. That is not what they were meant for. Judgmental coworkers may read a fellow workers information and automatically decide not to like them because of the information put. The hasty inductance that is caused by these types of sites are negative because it is hard to get to know someone unless time has been spent with them. Social networking sites allow for the time spent factor to be taken away and hasty generalization on character to be in place. Even though the benefits of networking are obvious, the process of meeting modern people, establishing regular contact and building meaningful relationships, is consistently challenging (Crappell Preparing for headmaster). These sites make it easier to avoid face to face conversation with a person, and just assume that a person is exactly like their online profile. Accidentally talking bad about a friended colleague on a social networking site might be one of the most horrifying things a worker could do, unless this worker was talking bad about his boss.This isnt considered cyber-fights or cyber-bullying because it was purely an accident, and the gossiped about colleague knows that. For example, posting on Facebook that the man in the cadre to the right smells bad is not a good idea especially due to the face that he is bored and on Facebook as well. He sees this and does not want confrontation, so he picks the alternative The Silent Treatment. Social networking sites cause grown adults to act like children. People argue that this can be prevented by simply paying attention.That, however, doesnt factor in the fact that people forget names every day a nd could very considerably forget the name of the person that sits in the cubicle to the right. Social networking sites are not the places for colleagues to mingle and these sites should definitely not be brought in the workplace if they have the potential to cause this many problems. The viruses that these networks could bring in are often overlooked. Many focus on the loss of productivity, the arguments and the mixture of the post and the home. However, not many workers realize the threats that they could be causing their companies. A juvenile FBI report indicates that phishing scams are becoming more common on social networking sites through a combination of viruses, hacked accounts, and decoy messages (Schiller Phishing Scams). Personal information and company information may be accessed through these sights and that is a major hazard for these companies. At a local restaurant, one of the employees got on Facebook and was sharing information with a friend. Little did this emp loyee know that the computer was being hacked. She let out way too much personal information about herself and ended up having to get a new credit card and wobble her Facebook password.The dangers of these sites are unbelievable and the risk factors should be left outside of the workplace. Social networking is a distraction in the workplace that hinders work and can cause dangerous viruses to come through the computer. It causes workers to lose sight of their work while allowing them access to look at other coworkers online. It also allows room for dangers such as company secrets and personal information to be leaked. Social networking is not a good thing for the work place because of the extreme loss of productivity and money that is caused primarily by these sites.It may appear in effect(p) to the bonding of the company, but socializing time for coworkers should be set up at breaks from work and by voice only, not by a social networking site. Ones work and ones personal life sho uld not be intermingled by these sites. By banning these sites from the workplace, offices will be more efficient, and businesses will be better protected from hackers and spammers. Works Cited Baker, Natasha J. How Far is Too Far? Employers and the custom of Online Searches. Young Lawyer. Feb. Mar. 2008 4+. Academic OneFile. Web. 9 Oct. 2011. Crappell, Courtney. Preparing For Professional Relationship Building. American Music Teacher. June-July 2011 10+. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Elzweig, Brian, and Donna K. Peeples. Using Social Networking Web Sites in Hiring and Retention. Decisions. SAM Advanced concern Journal Autumn 2009 27+. Academic OneFile. Web. 22 Oct. 2011. Facebook Costs Employers More Than $5 Billion A Year Security firms warn that Facebook use on the job could be putting a companys network at risk. InformationWeek 20 Aug. 2007. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Hunt, Kristin Gunderson. Finders keepers Social Media Strategies Help Find Top Talent. Journal of Property Management Nov. -Dec. 2010 36+. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schaffer, Noah. Online Networking Some Lawyers Sing Praises of Twitter and Facebook, WhileOthers take to task of Perils. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 27 Apr. 2009. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schiller, Kurt. Employers Crack stilt on Social Networking. Information Today Nov. 2009 21. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schiller, Kurt. Phishing Scams leap into Social Networks. Information Today Nov. 2009 46. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011.