What Is A `corpus` And Why Is It A Useful Tool For Someone Researching Modern English Structure?

[Name of writer appears here][Course name appears here][Professor s name appears here][Date appears here] school principalceptable lingual practice . As a consequence , even though the creators of the Brown Corpus , W . Nelson Francis and Henry Ku ?era , are presently regarded as pioneers and visionaries in the school principal linguistics community , in the sixties their efforts to create a machine-readable principal sum of English were not cordially accepted by many members of the linguistic community . W . Nelson Francis (1992 : 28 ) tells the story of a leading rich grammarian of the time characterizing the creation of the Brown Corpus as a useless and foolhardy enterprise because the only legitimate radical of grammatical knowledge about a verbiage was the intuitions of the primeval speaker , which could not be obtained from a corpus . Although somewhat linguists still hold to this belief , linguists of all persuasions are now far more open to the idea of using linguistic corpora for both descriptive and theoretical studies of language Moreover , the plane section and divisiveness that has characterized the relationship among the corpus linguist and the generative grammarian rests on a false assumption : that all corpus linguists are descriptivists , interested only in counting and categorizing constructions occurring in a corpus , and that all generative grammarians are theoreticians casual with the information on which their theories are establish .

Many corpus linguists are actively engaged in issues of language opening , and many generative grammarians have shown an increasing tending for the data upon which their theories are ground , even though data gathering remains at best a marginal concern in moderne generative theory (Meyer , 2002To explain why corpus linguistics and generative grammar have had such an aflutter relationship , and to explore the role of corpus analysis in linguistic theory , this chapter first discusses the goals of generative grammar and the three types of sufficiency (observational , descriptive , and explanatory ) that Chomsky claims linguistic s john look Investigating these three types of adequacy reveals the source of the conflict between the generative grammarian and the corpus linguist while the generative grammarian strives for explanatory adequacy (the highest train of adequacy , agree to Chomsky , the corpus linguist aims for descriptive adequacy (a lower level of adequacy , and it is arguable whether explanatory adequacy is even manageable through corpus analysis . However , even though generative grammarians and corpus linguists have different goals , it is wrong to strike that the analysis of corpora has nothing to contribute to linguistic theory : corpora can be invaluable resources for testing out linguistic hypotheses based on more functionally based theories of grammar , i .e . theories of language more interested in exploring language as a tool of communication . And the diversity of text types in modern corpora makes such investigations quite possible , a point illustrated in the middle section of the chapter , where a functional analysis of coordination eclipsis is presented that is based on various genres of the Brown Corpus and the multinational Corpus of English . Although corpora are ideal for functionally based analyses of language , they have other uses as...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper