brought it out only as a freshness brings out a haze" (Conrad 30).
This is like the compound experience, which looked to itself and its birth "home society" to determine what was and was not acceptable (or level valid) in its new territories.
Like teenagers, Marlow and Kurtz argon men who are disobeying the rules of the societies. Like teenagers, they (and particularly Kurtz) are rebelling against parental or social authority to assert their autonomy and independence.
When Marlow tells his audience that he doesn't pauperism to "bother"
them with the story of what happened to him personally, we can
expect that the story which unfolds will actually much be about
Marlow. From the beginning, therefore, we become convinced that
Marlow cannot be interpreted at face value and that any changes in his perspicacity of Kurtz may not be reliable.
Booth has suggested that this novel represents a "seamless
web.
" He points out that readers are still confused as to whether this novel is the story of Kurtz or Marlow's experience of Kurtz, and also asks whether or not it is possible to decide if Marlow was invented to tell the story of Kurtz's object lesson collapse or Kurtz was invested to provide a means of say Marlow's own experiences in the Congo as a colonial faced with the rule of the putatively "natural law" rather than the " third estate law" of England (Booth 346). So closely are the two charact
Heart of Darkness: Joseph Conrad: A pick out in Contemporary
Congo, Kurtz looms larger and larger on his personal opinion and
Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment